糖心vlog官网观看

NA

.

.

-

The course touches on useful themes. Improvements to the transcript (English) and question phrasing (English) would be extremely beneficial. At present, the phrasing of questions in the quizzes is challenging and leads to incorrect quiz performance. An example is asking for "two reasons" in the phrasing of a question, but only accepting single selections (selections NOT phrased as two reasons). Additionally, closer adherence of quiz to course material (for the nano course) could help.

not the course I was expecting it to be

Need to upgrade

GREAT LEARNING

Awsome

Many spelling errors made the reading material hard to follow. You can tell certain content was copied and pasted without someone reviewing it.

The videos are slow, the material is too basic.

This is by some margin the worst course I have ever taken. Aside from the amateurish spelling, the content itself is riddled with inaccuracies. Whether talking about data, the technological underpinnings of AI, the capabilities of major technology companies, or finance, the lecturer does not demonstrate even a basic grasp of the topic. His understanding of the subject is clearly flawed and the assessments serve only to take the student down the same misguided course.

Very basic and quite boring course. Assignments questions were irritatingly easy.

we do not have money to purchase certificates

Worst customer service and support

Not so fruitful

Useless course