糖心vlog官网观看

It's not a starter course. But helped me a lot in understanding Design language.

It's good to have this course it will help you learn design in a better way

Many terminologies, ways to describes the feedback were very helpful!

I gained a lot of experience in this training

so, Thank you very much

It was not as easy or as simple as I thought it would be.

Interesting course. definitely not for the beginners.

i enjoyed doing the course. it very interesting.

賰賳賵賰賲禺賳賲丞賰胤禺賳禺賰丞賰賲丞賲賰禺噩賲丞丞噩丞丞禺噩賶丞賲賰丞丞賵

good. it will really help me in future

袙褋械 锌芯薪褉邪胁懈谢芯褋褜

Amazing course.

its awasum

good

The course is well-designed, and the content is genuinely interesting and relevant. However, the delivery by the instructors leaves much to be desired. Instead of actively teaching, they mostly read pre-written essays in a monotonous and disengaging manner. This approach feels more like listening to a dry lecture than being part of an interactive learning experience. As someone with several years of experience as an instructor, I believe teaching should feel natural and dynamic, rather than simply reading aloud. It鈥檚 disappointing because the potential of this course is undermined by poor execution. If the instructors could focus on engaging with the material and presenting it in a more lively and interactive way, this course could be excellent.

the course was very useful and informative, also the teachers were very clear, however the examples given to us were all posters so it would be lovely if the final exam was the same because it was all about rebranding and visual identity, or at least if we had some example about the same subject so that we avoid the confusing.

the discussion approach is good for the subject but specific exercisers would be useful to develop skills to identify the different characteristics of a work

The videos, reading lexicon, and practice lessons were easy to follow and was clear, especially with the examples provided.

Tries so hard to be objective in the very subjective topic of design. Videos are often unbearable to watch.

It simply was not what I was looking for, and it might be what someone else is looking for.

Even though the course discusses form and meaning in general, it discusses it primarily through the lens of post-modernist art. Form and meaning have existed since primitive art (perhaps in an even more pure form than today. For example, hieroglyphs existed as the union of symbol and meaning/language) but they do not include this at all. Furthermore, they believe that social hierarchies are outdated phenomena, which is completely false. Although the lines of upper and lower class are blurred and the classes are a more abstract concept than "king vs peasant", there is still a clear distinction between upper class and lower class individuals, though it may be harder to grasp exactly what that distinction is.

I can tell the teachers are experts in their field.

But the material, the way the content is given, is void. This is two persons reading a text, there is no material here for future quick references or something. It is boring, and slow.

You are better off reading yourself than listening to them.

simple and clean easy and quick shoud be there

I didn't find the course interesting and i was soon bored by the videos. It didn't seem to keep me attentive and even the syllabus is quite great.

The changes to the user interface have made this course very difficult to navigate.

Don't watch enter the void