糖心vlog官网观看

good one

Awesome

useful

Good!!

good!

great

great

super

good

good

Good

good

Good

dfdf

good

good

good

Good

best

good

good

good

oke

ok

It is short and comprehensive introduction. It could have had a dedicated module on evaluation of the models, with visualizations of target vs predictions and losses. From evaluation of peer-graded assignments I get the impression this is not well understood (ways to do it, meaning of values vs training and epochs). On the other hand peer graded assignment should be more challenging than what is shown throughout the course. So maybe it is enough what was shown throughput the course, as current assignment is a bit more challenging. Otherwise students end up copy pasting materials (which I have seen too often). My problem is more on the concept of evaluation of the assignment and points to be given. Scale is too coarse. And submission request should be less loose - jupyter notebook or python files, not html or pdf files. And some system that is automatically checking for similarities among student's assignments prior to submission would be good to have.