FO
Oct 9, 2020
I'm extremely excited with what I have learnt so far. As a newbie in Machine Learning, the exposure gained will serve as the much needed foundation to delve into its application to real life problems.
RC
Feb 7, 2019
The course was highly informative and very well presented. It was very easier to follow. Many complicated concepts were clearly explained. It improved my confidence with respect to programming skills.
By Cristian C P 脕
鈥Nov 15, 2019
Good!
By Srijam S
鈥Apr 26, 2025
good
By Prince K
鈥Apr 23, 2025
Nice
By PUSHPRAJ J
鈥Apr 13, 2025
good
By Sungyong P
鈥Feb 4, 2025
good
By kanimozhi g
鈥Sep 14, 2024
good
By Abdoulaye W D
鈥Oct 8, 2023
GOOD
By Muqseet F
鈥Apr 18, 2023
good
By Girija S M
鈥Aug 24, 2022
nice
By A R
鈥Feb 20, 2022
good
By Anshuman R
鈥Jul 15, 2021
good
By Mullangi T
鈥Jun 21, 2021
GOOD
By SHALINI S
鈥Sep 6, 2020
Good
By Zakir H
鈥Jul 19, 2020
Good
By Sudhanshu R
鈥Jun 12, 2020
good
By Tejas S
鈥Apr 28, 2020
good
By VIGNESHKUMAR R
鈥Dec 26, 2019
Good
By Lakshmi N
鈥Dec 11, 2019
Good
By lokesh s
鈥Jul 17, 2019
good
By Hiep D X
鈥Oct 18, 2022
ok
By syed s
鈥Aug 8, 2021
wow
By piyush s
鈥May 19, 2020
ok
By Pagadala G s
鈥May 18, 2020
Ok
By RABAB E
鈥Dec 15, 2023
.
By Malte H
鈥Jan 12, 2021
PRO: Good overview and basic introduction of common machine learning techniques.
CON:
- The final assignment is peer reviewed! I saw no mention of this before purchasing the course. This means you are at the mercy of other students who may have less experience than you and may notbe qualified in grading assignments. Also it may mean you have to wait a long time before you get your certificate. It would be better to implement a Kaggle-style assessment of the models and use that to obtain a score and turn that into a grade. This would be transparent and instantaneous.
Some of the forum answers provided by the teaching staff are half baked and often inconsistent. e.g. they give example code for making a figure and and also a figure. But the figure is obviously not made with the provided code and the code contains typos. This is frustrating and makes learning harder than it should be.
Some of the code in the lab exercises don鈥檛 obey good practices. e.g. in every lab the data is normalised before train/test splitting. In the final project there is a comment that this should be done the other way around (and it really should!). Why not do it the right way in all the examples throughout the course?