糖心vlog官网观看

The peer-graded assignment is a mess - especially if you try resubmitting work. There is no incentive or way for peers to grade assignments after they have done their two reviews. Please work on this IBM.

course was fine, but the review process was bad organized. following the instructions, the reviewer couldn't see the work of the student. also not ideal, that students score the work of other students...

This course is not as well put together as some of the other Python/Data science courses I've completed. In particular, the final assignment is not clear, as you can tell from viewing the week 6 forum.

Mathematical basis of the algorithms were explained with less emphasis on coding. The coding part along with the algorithms were also not explained in the lab sessions.Needs improvement.

needs some updating - the exercises and assignment notebooks are out of date and some quiz questions don't match with the video content. Also it looks like the forum is not maintained

Too basic. Also, its easy to pass this course without much efforts. Should include more assignments that require writing bunch of code. Also, should have different project for people.

The course content was wholly inadequate preparation for completing the final assignment. I had to read and watch several hours of other materials in order to complete this course.

All slides with a recorded robotic voice. Not clear explanation of the overview ML methods, seems liek every slide is not connected to the previous one. Overall not satisfied.

袨褔械薪褜 锌芯胁械褉褏薪芯褋褌薪褘泄.

袝褋谢懈 胁褘 - 泻褍褏邪褉泻邪, 懈 褏芯褌懈褌械 锌芯泄褌懈 胁 写邪褌邪褋邪械薪褋 - 胁邪屑 褋褞写邪.

袨褑械薪泻邪 泻褍褉褋邪 薪械 胁褋械谐写邪 芯褔械胁懈写薪邪, 胁邪褋 芯褑械薪懈胁邪褞褌 袠薪写褍褋褘, 泻芯褌芯褉褘械 褋邪屑懈 胁 褝褌芯屑 胁褋械屑 芯褋芯斜芯 薪械 锌芯薪懈屑邪褞褌.

Videos were way too long. They were only about theory and no code was featured. Labs were packed with code without proper explanation. That way of teaching is just not for me.

kind of boring. the voice makes me daydream and not interactive enough. i want the videos to tell me how to code. not the labs. i don't want to read two pages of stuff.

Very basic course (which is OK) with a particularly confusing final project. Wasn't hard because of the coursework, but was hard because of poorly documented process.

15 minute lecture of droning on about concepts that are "out of scope for the course" but then proceeds to just pretend like we don't need to learn or he said that.

A lot of mistakes, typos, and misleading concept. I spent more time figuring out the wrong concept than actual learning. Course materials should be accurate!!!

Found this course to be confusing. With that said, it was not a waste of time since there are some labs that are beneficial in understanding the concept.

The final assignment was completely bizarre, I think there are missing some instructions to guide the student, and the avaliation was completely 0/1.

Have to sign up IBM account in order to complete the last (most important) project, which is like doing advertising on purpose.

Introduced a lot of code in the assignments while providing no explanation of what it does. Lazy course writing.

Course has glitch in final assignment. People are completing but it is not completing the course for them.

A lot of spelling errors during the course. The sample presented on the final project is very basic.

The course lacked material on several subjects, and the assignment need more explanation.

Not for someone who is looking for a in depth course, it just scratches the surface.

"Time series" prediction is missing, I was passionate to learn about that.

I AM NOT SUITABLE FOR THIS COURSE. I LOOKING FOR CODING KNOWLEDGE.

Just teaches you to go through the motions. No real understanding.