Learner Reviews & Feedback for Supervised Machine Learning: Regression and Classification by DeepLearning.AI
About the Course
Top reviews
FA
May 25, 2023
The course was extremely beginner friendly and easy to follow, loved the curriculum, learned a lot about various ML algorithms like linear, and logistic regression, and was a great overall experience.
AD
Nov 24, 2022
Amazingly delivered course! Very impressed. The concepts are communicated very clearly and concisely, making the course content very accessible to those without a maths or computer science background.
5676 - 5700 of 5,721 Reviews for Supervised Machine Learning: Regression and Classification
By Krishna S
鈥May 22, 2024
too fast
By Kushagra G
鈥Oct 15, 2024
decent
By Eman E
鈥Feb 10, 2024
good
By Mahesh G
鈥Aug 22, 2023
s
By Richie B
鈥Nov 30, 2022
Great course if you know how to program, but you really need a python background to appreciate it.
By Daniele d b
鈥Dec 14, 2023
quite too basics...too few practical exercise, just scratching the surface of ML
By rverker
鈥Jun 23, 2024
Impossible to do the exercises if you don't pay. The course is interesting.
By Rohan S
鈥Jun 3, 2025
The course should have mentioned that Python knowledge is a prerequisite.
By Juergen G
鈥Aug 15, 2023
Very nice and helpful for my next career steps.
By Anish I
鈥Jan 30, 2024
too theoretical, not much hands on learning
By Shoaib K
鈥Sep 7, 2024
Fix your week 2 lab exercise the last one
By Houssam T
鈥Sep 22, 2023
i want to see my name on this certeficate
By Natalia S
鈥Feb 25, 2024
no math exercises to practice
By wenyi z
鈥Jun 29, 2025
suggest don't include code
By Spikey
鈥Nov 8, 2022
Oversimplified
By Abhinav S
鈥Dec 3, 2022
not good
By Philip R K
鈥Aug 25, 2025
all optional labs were non function due to improper python code so useless. I also felt nothing was really taught all surface level and repeated examples. within two days I knew a middle scalar was need for optimum results which were briefly touched on at the end of week 3. the auto grader remains one of the other biggest problems. you either get 0/100 or 100/100. also, upon proper completion no feedback is given to reinforce or learn from yet, I had to trial and error and resubmit to see what the auto grader was crashing against. The last programming assignment was awful we are never even given the blueprints to do this let alone fix the auto grader despite having correct cells other data given would fail that was given. trial and error is not learning. we were expected to be flawless yet not one optional lab performed correctly due to code errors. I will use this example, I am teaching rocket science, but I leave out how the thrusters work and never talk about propulsion, would you be successful? Other lies passed off as facts you can complete this 3-course program in 10 hours a week and be done in two months how? course one i did in 9 days not 3 weeks and spent 70 hours I see course two and it's four weeks; this is not an accidental error but a grievous one. all of this is unacceptable in a paid course and supposed learning environment.
By Herman S
鈥Aug 3, 2025
袣褍褉褋 薪械 写谢褟 胁褋械褏. 袝褋谢懈 褍 胁邪褋 薪械褌 蟹薪邪薪懈泄 胁 锌褉芯谐褉邪屑屑懈褉芯胁邪薪懈懈, 褉邪蟹谢懈褔薪褘褏 斜懈斜谢懈芯褌械泻, 芯褌谢懈褔薪芯谐芯 蟹薪邪薪懈褟 屑邪褌械屑邪褌懈泻懈, 谢懈薪械泄薪褘褏 褍褉邪胁薪械薪懈泄 胁 褔邪褋褌薪芯褋褌懈 胁褘 锌褉芯褋褌芯 薪械 锌芯泄屑褢褌械 芯 褔械屑 褌褍褌 褉械褔褜. 携 懈屑械褞 薪械褋泻芯谢褜泻芯 褋械褉褌懈褎懈泻邪褌芯胁 胁 锌褉芯谐褉邪屑屑懈褉芯胁邪薪懈懈 懈 褋 屑邪褌械屑邪褌懈泻芯泄 薪械褌 锌褉芯斜谢械屑, 芯写薪邪泻芯 写谢褟 屑械薪褟 褝褌芯褌 泻褍褉褋 薪械 斜褘谢 锌褉芯褋褌褘屑. 孝邪泻 卸械 褋邪屑芯 懈褋锌芯谢薪械薪懈械 泻褍褉褋邪 芯褔械薪褜 锌谢芯褏芯械 - 褋械泄褔邪褋 褕泻芯谢褜薪褘械 锌褉械蟹械薪褌邪褑懈懈 写械褌懈 写械谢邪褞褌 谢褍褔褕械. P.S. 袧械 锌褉械褍胁械谢懈褔懈胁邪褞, 斜械蟹 褏械泄褌邪 懈谢懈 斜芯谢褜褕懈褏 芯卸懈写邪薪懈泄, 锌褉芯褋褌芯 锌芯褌芯屑褍 褔褌芯 褌邪泻芯泄 泻褍褉褋.
By Audrey K G
鈥Oct 5, 2024
I encountered persistent errors in Week 2 (2nd course), specifically in the exercise where I was expected to build a neural network using Keras. Despite following the instructions and trying different solutions, the autograder continued to return errors about incorrect activations and model configurations, even when the code appeared to match the expected solution. This issue blocked my progress, and I was unable to complete the assignment successfully.
By Patricia R
鈥Oct 21, 2023
Me paso lo mismo con el curso anterior y es que si no realizas los laboratorios aunque hayas aprobado todo y a pesar de que los test te dan como aprobados dicen que no apruebas y que quedas en 0%, es algo como reiterativo con coursera asi que me rindo, no continuo intentando sacarme certificados por ac谩
By Kamil W
鈥Oct 23, 2024
Awful course. Labs aren't explained clearly at all. You pay 拢37 per month and you end up with a few slides a few hours of explanation and unclear labs. The final graded assignment was a joke as well, the very first exercise was the hardest of them while the rest was trivial.
By DV B
鈥Jun 21, 2024
Mostly I was inundated with Nagware after ever short video segment, only to discover that Machine Learning learning was not even introduced. Wasted much time on trivialities like linear regression. I never learned anything about Machine Learning, per se.
By Naman G
鈥Dec 7, 2024
please help in coding part , theory won't be helping building real world models, please increase lecture length and do include coding part , please otherwise it is just understanding of theory which is of no use unless implemented by ourselves
By 携薪邪 袦
鈥Aug 5, 2025
携 褋锌械褑懈邪谢褜薪芯 懈蟹褍褔邪谢邪 锌褉芯谐褉邪屑懈褉芯胁邪薪懈械 锌械褉械写 褝褌懈屑 泻褍褉褋芯屑 懈 斜褘蟹褘 写邪薪薪褘褏 薪芯 褝褌芯 屑薪械 薪械 锌芯屑芯谐谢芯. 袝褋谢懈 褍 胁邪褋 薪械褌 蟹薪邪薪懈泄 Python/ Nampy/ 褉邪蟹薪褘褏 斜懈斜谢懈芯褌械泻 锌褉芯谐褉邪屑懈褉芯胁邪薪懈褟/ 褋芯蟹写邪薪懈褟 谐褉邪褎懈泻芯胁 懈 褏芯褉芯褕械泄 邪谢谐械斜褉褘 胁褘 薪械 锌芯褌褟薪懈褌械 褝褌芯褌 泻褍褉褋.
By MAULIK B 2
鈥Oct 11, 2024
Can't access labs even after getting full access what is the use of financial aid if you can't access all the material! If this is how it is gonna be people will probably just use torrent courses :(