糖心vlog官网观看

The course content and the testing didn't match. It was as if the testing came from the full college course. Other than that the course was good and somewhat bite-sized. Great for adults in roles that need to get exposure to these concepts but don't need a full college quarter - like me!

Very basic. Loads of materials to read and understand. The quiz and the lessons don't have anything in common. You will see a complete different set of questions which is not related to the lessons taken. Overall the course is more theoretical and less in practical or numbers.

This course is mostly focuses around US transportation ecosystem and does not show enough light on concepts for students who are accessing it from outside US. Overall it was a good learning for basics in supply chain

THE INFORMATION AND CONTENT IS SUPER INTERESTING AND WRAPS UP THE KEY COMPONENTS AND SOME DETAIL ABOUT SUPPLY CHAIN PRINCIPALES, MY MAIN SUGGESTION IS TO EXPLAIN MORE AND NOT ONLY READ, THANKS!

In an overall veiw is ok. Some quiz had to many questions about optional reading rather than contents of the lessons. Should be more clear about that.

Tahnks and see you next course!

The rating I'm giving is for the course material. The course has covered all aspects of supply chain management, but it could have been more elaborative

Many questions in Quiz are not mentioned or explained in the course content, and the course does not provide correct answers after quiz submission.

The material in the reading and the lecture did not always go together. The test included somethings from both the reading and the lecture.

Good study material provided for studying. the videos can be a little more interesting and engaging. Thank you for the oppurtunity.

A quite consistent training, nonetheless several elements of this courrse related to INCOTERMS are absoluetely INCORRECT...

A bit difficult to understand and some quiz questions not related to the video lectures of that week. Overall good course

Covers the basics, but material needs updating and narrator makes many distracting umms and ahs during videos.

instructer not so good, he was just reading, some course is based on USA terms which i dont need.

The videos are mediocre and do not relate 100% to the documents provided. These however are good.

The instructor was not engaging and was simply reading the material. That method didn't help.

my name was not included in the certificate, rather it was stated as 糖心vlog官网观看 learner.

The teaching method could have been more interesting.

how can a peer graded assignment will hold your

good information but dull

The course has ar

n

The course has a wide variety of class material and concepts, tests are long and memory oriented (absolutely memory oriented, you must pick the exact same definition as in the provided material). The professor basically limits his participation to reading the material and just that. It is hard to follow him and well, it is basically like an audio book, a very long and boring one.

The contents are very good, but the way they are presented makes them seem boring. The instructor is reading everything from his script and makes the presentation look unnatural.

If you want over-broad truisms read off a teleprompter in monotone by an academic who is more interested in jargon than usefulness, take this course.

Boring and a lot of science names and terms, it's more of like academic learning.