糖心vlog官网观看

Chevron Left
Back to Introduction to Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Learner Reviews & Feedback for Introduction to Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis by Johns Hopkins University

4.8
stars
3,460 ratings

About the Course

We will introduce methods to perform systematic reviews and meta-analysis of clinical trials. We will cover how to formulate an answerable research question, define inclusion and exclusion criteria, search for the evidence, extract data, assess the risk of bias in clinical trials, and perform a meta-analysis. Upon successfully completing this course, participants will be able to: - Describe the steps in conducting a systematic review - Develop an answerable question using the 鈥淧articipants Interventions Comparisons Outcomes鈥� (PICO) framework - Describe the process used to collect and extract data from reports of clinical trials - Describe methods to critically assess the risk of bias of clinical trials - Describe and interpret the results of meta-analyses...

Top reviews

PS

Aug 23, 2019

Introduction to Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis course is a very good source for beginners which provides an overview on fundamental terminology and steps involved in the systematic review.

MJ

Jan 8, 2019

Although introductory, I do carry out reviews as a researcher. I Learned a lot to improve my systematic reviews through this course. High quality, though the music could be a little less intense.

Filter by:

726 - 750 of 896 Reviews for Introduction to Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

By Nusrath R

鈥�

Jul 4, 2020

AWESOME

By Paloma M M R

鈥�

Apr 15, 2017

great!!

By Thunayan

鈥�

Jan 10, 2017

perfect

By Akhilesh V S

鈥�

Jun 9, 2016

Excelle

By Ivette H

鈥�

Sep 4, 2021

genial

By Zhiqi Q

鈥�

Sep 26, 2020

Great!

By Parul P

鈥�

Dec 17, 2017

Superb

By 携泻芯胁谢械胁邪 袙 袗

鈥�

Jan 8, 2025

Nice!

By QUINTERO A A

鈥�

Dec 1, 2021

good

By Ramu V

鈥�

May 8, 2020

great

By Adam O

鈥�

Nov 28, 2016

Great

By Dr. V B

鈥�

Nov 26, 2020

good

By Mangali M

鈥�

Sep 29, 2020

good

By Mona A A

鈥�

Sep 27, 2020

good

By gabriela s

鈥�

Sep 3, 2020

good

By illona w

鈥�

Apr 27, 2020

good

By Ahmed B

鈥�

Apr 9, 2019

Grea

By Angela

鈥�

Aug 26, 2016

Good

By Edison M

鈥�

Feb 6, 2018

Exc

By Yamile C S C

鈥�

Jun 23, 2019

OK

By Yarisbeth Q

鈥�

Sep 1, 2021

.

By Zahra N

鈥�

Aug 6, 2021

By Amani

鈥�

Mar 11, 2020

T

By GINA K S R

鈥�

Jan 24, 2020

.

By Hayley F

鈥�

Sep 1, 2020

Overall, I enjoyed the course, and as someone who has read systemic reviews but not undertaken them, I feel that I have learned a lot. The course is not perfect - some of the information presented is out of date, with the videos appearing to be at least five years old. Much of the course is underpinned by reviews which determined how to optimize systematic reviews, and it is likely that more is now known than when the videos were made. The age of the course also meant that the quoted sections of the Cochrane Handbook are several editions out of date, and the module on search strategies included screenshots of PubMed's old interface rather than the new 2020 interface. However, the underlying principles for both the Cochrane Handbook and PubMed are the same, so this didn't detract too much from the course. The three instructors had varying presentation styles, with one tending to read every word on the slide. Luckily an engaging speaker delivered the majority of the videos.