Learner Reviews & Feedback for Generative AI: Prompt Engineering Basics by IBM
About the Course
Top reviews
NM
Nov 15, 2024
This course is well suited for anyone curious about AI, informing others, or teaching in the classroom. The examples are assisted by IBM Watsonx.ai, an amazing interactive tool. Get started now!!
HD
Jul 25, 2025
This course was an eye-opening introduction into the power of prompt engineering and how strategic inputs can drive more accurate, creative, and relevant responses from generative AI models.
2001 - 2025 of 2,097 Reviews for Generative AI: Prompt Engineering Basics
By Shubhankar C E 2 B
鈥Jul 15, 2025
good
By Shaheen P
鈥Jul 13, 2025
good
By KAROL Y V C
鈥Jun 2, 2025
nada
By Isabella G
鈥May 8, 2025
bien
By Hemamalini R
鈥May 7, 2025
good
By Haritha S
鈥Apr 15, 2025
good
By DINA M R C
鈥Mar 3, 2025
Dina
By Habibullah K
鈥Jan 29, 2025
nice
By 081-PRAVIN K P
鈥Nov 29, 2024
Good
By Juan C C S
鈥Nov 20, 2024
bien
By Samuel A P O
鈥Sep 14, 2024
Bien
By DILAN A E L
鈥Jun 24, 2025
dil
By Kantesh K
鈥Jun 16, 2025
gr8
By Dhruv n
鈥Apr 10, 2025
Vfd
By 505_ S S
鈥Sep 24, 2024
nyc
By davide 2
鈥Oct 7, 2025
jj
By Daniel E s
鈥Oct 24, 2025
.
By DANA S R M
鈥Aug 23, 2025
.
By EVER D B S
鈥Jun 3, 2025
4
By lizeth m
鈥Feb 28, 2025
4
By jean k r
鈥Nov 15, 2024
.
By Abhilash
鈥Oct 25, 2024
.
By Edna N P H
鈥Oct 12, 2024
b
By Juan S A A
鈥Sep 8, 2024
.
By Aurora-Alexandra C
鈥Oct 29, 2025
I found that the course wasn鈥檛 as well structured as I had expected. This became clear once I started taking notes and realized it was quite difficult to identify a logical flow or to group the information in a meaningful way. The material often felt fragmented, which made it harder to see how different concepts connect to each other. Another aspect that stood out to me was the format of the lessons. Most of the course consists of static slides or images accompanied by a rather impersonal voiceover. In previous courses, we had instructors who appeared on screen or interacted directly with the learners, explaining concepts in a more dynamic and engaging way. That personal interaction made a big difference in maintaining attention and motivation, and I really missed that here. Additionally, the examples provided throughout the course tend to be quite long and sometimes difficult to follow. While detailed examples can be useful, in this case they often felt overwhelming, and it was hard to extract the key ideas or practical takeaways. Breaking them into smaller, clearer parts or providing summaries after each example might make the content much easier to digest. Overall, I appreciate the effort that went into creating the course, but I think it could be significantly improved by refining its structure, increasing human interaction, and making the examples more concise and focused.