糖心vlog官网观看

There should be more contemprary reflections of diplomacy.

It was a good introduction but felt kind of shallow.

How can I get certificate? is not if free?

how do i earn a free certificate

Pretty good, but very easy.

兀賵噩賴 賲卮賰賱賴 賮賷 鬲爻賱賷賲 丕賱賵丕噩亘

Good to start with.

outdated

. . ,

Good.

I insist there be added a few quizes on the reading material. It has been given no weightage at all.

This course seems like a compilation of perspectives on diplomacy-success,failures and the worth of trust, by various professors and a few luminaries.

More qualitative content can be added I feel, because the people who speak do not seem to be prepared and speak ad lib. This is however good since what then would come out would be from the deepest recesses of their valuable experiences and stuff. But this is a course on diplomacy. People must walk out of having become better at diplomatic skills.

A little focus has to be given to developing that.

A portion of international history would also be helpful since all speakers talk about so many important agreements yet there is no content available from the course on all that. Yeah we can google it out but I think there can be a more narrativity in the interview like environment that the course teacher creates for the interviewees.

Thank you for the compilation!

The lectures were not very interesting or instructive. The reading materials were much more so. However, the assignments in the class were based much more on the lectures and on self-reflection than on the materials. I learned a little bit, and as such found the course worth the time I put into it, but I almost think one could get through this course with little difficulty without reading any of the written materials, and thus derive very little benefit from it. I would encourage the makers of this course to do a significant revamping.

(In addition to greater incorporation and emphasis on the written materials, I think more real-life examples of diplomatic successes and failures would be a far more effective and entertaining use of the lecture time than the esoteric philosophising that seems to characterize it in this edition.)

While I appreciated that there are many distinguished speakers that shared their unique insights every week, I find that it is rather conversational without much learning points for us. We are also graded based on peer review, and sometimes other classmates do not give the minimum feedback of 50 words and the review may also be uninformative and unproductive to learning, which is unhelpful to the essay we craft for every assignment. The topics are also rather entry-level and provided little insight about contemporary situation and the evolving issues surrounding diplomacy. Overall it lacks the depth, breadth and rigour that I would like to have experience in this course.

The course is average till the fifth module, the fifth module was too long with almost 15 short videos asking the same question " what is diplomacy according to them" and next question is what is successful and unsuccessful diplomacy. I can say is a very basic course and to be very straight i do not recommend this course.

They should remove the fifth module and add some interesting videos about diplomacy.

Extremadamente introductorio y mediocre. Cero participaci贸n de los docentes, todos hombres, quienes a lo m谩s compart铆an un video de 5 minutos a la semana, lecturas desfasadas y absolutamente ninguna comunicaci贸n con docentes encargados. Recomendado para estudiantes de escuelas secundarias, mas no para profesionales tratando de incursionar en el campo de la diplomacia.

Although the interviews were interesting, I had expected much more from this course. It was not academically rigorous at all and I can't say I learned very much at all at the end of the course.

Not as advanced as other 糖心vlog官网观看 courses, this course if for participants who do not have any background in international relations and diplomacy. Wish they would have made it more advanced.

This course was long, tedious and boring. Although some aspects were interesting, a lot of it was redundant. Way too many written assignments.

poor matirial and lack of it, almost no intro and short !

Very little information shared

None of useful information.

no certificate???

Informative

I think the course is more set to sensitize than it is to really teach. I can鈥檛 say聽聽I learned anything major apart from the very basics of what defines diplomacy. I feel like the content was also repetitive (videos) throughout but I鈥檓 glad reading material was provided for in depth understanding .

Otherwise it was my first course on 糖心vlog官网观看 and it was a good starter.聽

I do not want to sound mean, the interviews were interesting but the course did not feel engaging for me, I felt like doing it because it was short and I already had started, but it does not get deeper in any subject, the reading are too long or the link doesn't work...