Learner Reviews & Feedback for Drug Development by University of California San Diego
About the Course
Top reviews
JG
Jan 18, 2021
I thought this course was done very well. The lectures were extremely informative and easy to follow. They connected very well with the audience. I would recommend this course to others...and I will.
KR
May 25, 2020
I am really glad to have course offered by california university . Its really helpful for me. And i am thankful to all lecturer, and teachers to explain overall drug development process. Thank you!
451 - 475 of 480 Reviews for Drug Development
By Adrija C
鈥Nov 3, 2020
US- centric course. The content in week 3 was not well explained and felt rushed.
By Aneesh T G
鈥Aug 23, 2020
More emphasis on the filing and submissions and approvals need to be there
By Carolina S V
鈥Dec 27, 2017
Weeks 1 and 2 are great, but the classes of week 3 need more organization.
By Damien V
鈥Sep 18, 2018
good up to phase 2 (included). Phase 3 and after was less informative
By Michael A
鈥Feb 2, 2025
Too outdated; wish there was some new material (it's 2025)!
By Sean K
鈥Feb 22, 2022
Lot of outdated information and poor presentation slides
By Brian M
鈥Apr 25, 2021
It's from 2013. Good overview but time for an update.
By Miguel M V
鈥Aug 31, 2020
would like an specialization on this matter
By Budupula K
鈥Jun 19, 2021
I gained knowledge
By Sofia B J
鈥Sep 2, 2020
goooooood
By Aman b
鈥Sep 15, 2021
good
By DR. A G
鈥Sep 5, 2020
good
By Pratiksha
鈥Jun 2, 2020
n
i
c
e
By Dale G Y
鈥Aug 25, 2021
Had hoped to hear a better description of the types of trials and more about the Regulators' logic in deciding what trials a drug must have - PK for ANDA? BE for ANDA? P1 and P3 for 505B2? Does PK=P1? These topics are useful. Need to define these options and explain the reason for using them for different scenarios. That's part of what I expected from Drug Development.
The lecture style of second half was difficult. More structure, clear pronunciation, less random thoughts about unexplained topics.
By Mohamed T H
鈥Jul 19, 2020
Phase 1 was explained nicely. But phase 2 description was unclear with some diagrams with not much context and a lot of acronyms thrown around. Did not learn a lot about phase 3 either. The presentation slides were very busy like the previous course.
By Malamati V
鈥Oct 23, 2020
I felt like the lectures were not so organized as far as their material is concerned. I also found the overall course more "business-oriented" than actually educational.
By Nayanika P
鈥Jan 8, 2022
Okayish. I wouldn't recommend this. If you're really passionate about Drug Development and it's clinical aspects, try and find better courses.
By Alejandro G
鈥May 29, 2020
The course was not structured as an online course. the slides were quite boring and some of the speakers were not enthusiastic
By Ya臒mur P
鈥Sep 26, 2025
These are really old videos; low quality, cut suddenly, and the data is outdated.
By Deleted A
鈥Sep 14, 2022
Outdated series of classes that offer no real learning opportunities.
By Arash Y
鈥Mar 3, 2018
Presentation slides and sound quality is at its lowest.
By Benoit E
鈥Feb 21, 2019
A lot too much bla bla on the Phase iv part
By GHAIDA D M A G D M A
鈥Oct 23, 2025
The quiz is not working
By Michael M
鈥Sep 9, 2020
I only looked at the slides, as I wanted to confirm, what I read in some of the reviews. A standard issue on 糖心vlog官网观看 is, that material is not maintained and updated. I have worked in the pharmaceutical industry for more than 15 years now and everything is constantly evolving. The world of 2013 is not the world of 2020 and course material should e updated regularly.