Learner Reviews & Feedback for AI Workflow: Machine Learning, Visual Recognition and NLP by IBM
About the Course
Top reviews
PL
May 3, 2020
The teaching materials are well presented and clear.Just that the level of this course is a bit not advanced enough.
BG
Sep 22, 2020
Its pretty difficult to follow up with this course. We must have a good knowledge on Neural n/ws prior starting this course.
1 - 14 of 14 Reviews for AI Workflow: Machine Learning, Visual Recognition and NLP
By Neela M
鈥Jul 8, 2020
Dear Team ,
Namaste Everyone !!
Excellent Course structure - ML, VR and NLP.
Great Learning Module Design by All Faculty.
Thanks to everyone!!!
By Patrick L
鈥May 4, 2020
The teaching materials are well presented and clear.
Just that the level of this course is a bit not advanced enough.
By vignaux
鈥Nov 18, 2019
Great course with a lot of practice and smart meaning !
By Julio C
鈥Jul 30, 2020
Great training !!!
By Suryabrata D
鈥Jul 6, 2020
very Informative
By Takahide M
鈥Jan 4, 2023
Very Nice.
By AKARAPU K
鈥Aug 12, 2024
Very good
By 啸芯谢屑褍褏邪屑械写芯胁邪 袟 袘 泻
鈥May 31, 2022
Perfect
By Hu峄硁h T 脗
鈥Mar 15, 2025
hay
By BHAVANA g
鈥Sep 23, 2020
Its pretty difficult to follow up with this course. We must have a good knowledge on Neural n/ws prior starting this course.
By S M A J
鈥May 28, 2020
Good for using IBM tools
By Dennis L
鈥Aug 30, 2020
Theory Overview only
By David L
鈥Aug 26, 2020
Aspects of this course could be worked on with regards to smoothness, conceptual teaching and grammatical/spelling errors.
Much of the course had confusing terminology/grammatical forms which made multiple lessons difficult to understand. The video quality was, for the most part, very well done -- but some videos moved too quickly to follow (although it may just be my current level is too low).
I really enjoyed the case studies for the most part; they were challenging and informative, forcing you to learn yourself. There were a couple of areas where I would've appreciated more guidance, such as setting up the MLP/CNN at the end of Week 2. I had no idea that we needed to use a sparse-categorical-crossentropy loss function until I looked at the solution -- and I'm not sure other students would know the same.
Otherwise, it was a useful course.
By Quinzy F
鈥Oct 10, 2024
Too much time on Theory. Little practical work. The practical work is basic and not advanced. Misspellings in Material and Downloads indicate a poor attention to detail from instructors.