SC
Apr 9, 2020
The course design is excellent specially for beginners to study and understand the basic concepts in Artificial Intelligence. The lessons and course material are perfect and apt for this course-level.
RS
Jun 14, 2020
This course absolutely helped me a lot to understand the basics of artificial intelligence, the hand-on labs are extremely fascinating to learn practical things on IBM WatsonThank You, 糖心vlog官网观看...!!!
By Evgeny C
鈥Apr 27, 2021
1. 袨褔械薪褜 懈薪褌械褉械褋薪邪褟 褌械屑邪 锌褉械写褋褌邪胁谢械薪邪 褋邪屑褘屑 薪械懈薪褌械褉械褋薪褘屑 芯斜褉邪蟹芯屑.
2. 袛谢褟 褌械褏, 泻褌芯 锌谢芯褏芯 蟹薪邪械褌 邪薪谐谢懈泄褋泻懈泄 褟蟹褘泻 懈 褋屑芯褌褉懈褌 褋 褋褍斜褌懈褌褉邪屑懈 锌谢芯褏芯 芯锌褌懈屑懈蟹懈褉芯胁邪薪邪 锌芯写邪褔邪 屑邪褌械褉懈邪谢邪 懈 褋写邪褔邪 褌械褋褌芯胁.
3. 袩芯褋谢械写薪懈泄 褌械褋褌 芯褑械薪懈胁邪褞褌 褌邪泻懈械 卸械 褍褔械薪懈泻懈 泻邪泻 懈 袙褘. 袝褋谢懈 胁褘 锌谢芯褏芯 褎芯褉屑褍谢懈褉褍械褌械 屑褘褋谢褜 薪邪 邪薪谐谢懈泄褋泻芯屑, 褌芯 锌芯谢褍褔懈褌械 锌谢芯褏褍褞 芯褑械薪泻褍, 泻芯褌芯褉邪褟 锌芯胁谢懈褟械褌 薪邪 芯褑械薪泻褍 褋械褉褌懈褎懈泻邪褌邪.
By Aaron Y
鈥Jan 21, 2022
As an engineer, this course seems geared towards training sales and business personnel the very basics of AI ML DS. With the information from this course I learned a few terms, but nothing functional to help me develop models or perform tasks related to this skill. If you're a non-engineer I would recommend it. Otherwise spend your time elsewhere.
By Floris V
鈥May 17, 2022
The first two weeks are very helpful at establishing a broad understanding of AI. The third and fourth week lacks depth and mostly feels like an IBM advertisement at best and IBM propaganda at worst. Therefore the second part of this course is not really something I would want to pay for. The first part is worth it though!
By Lee P
鈥May 5, 2024
There were grammar and spelling errors in the deck. The audio in the 3rd module was terrible. It was obvious some of the presenters were reading form a script which was distracting. I would have expected a better presentation, so I am a little disappointed.
By Maria P
鈥Jan 8, 2025
Good overview, but the course materials are very hard to focus on (monotonous AI voice) and look surprisingly unprofessional. The badge is not signed directly by IBM, but by 糖心vlog官网观看, which in my opinion makes the course less attractive on your CV.
By Salve A R
鈥Oct 18, 2021
the course data and videos are great no doubt about it however it is the verification process for obtaining the certification for this course which involves face scanning is severely flawed.I havent been able to get my certificate for a long time.
By Luciana E
鈥Jul 25, 2024
Las mujeres aparecen casi 煤nicamente (apareci贸 una antes menos de 30 segundos) para hablar de 茅tica, de diversidad e inclusi贸n. Como ense帽a el curso, los bias que tiene la IA nacen de los huamnos. Ac谩, evidentemente los hay.
By KY L
鈥Mar 18, 2025
The content feels more like an advertisement for IBM or AI in business rather than a structured course. Additionally, there is too much repetitive information, which reduces the overall effectiveness of the material.
By Nate R
鈥Aug 7, 2021
Overview of AI and data science, so it lives up to its "Introduction" title. Not much on the mechanisms but plenty of talk. Its kind of like paying for IBM commercial with AI info surrounding the promotions.
By Ernesto H
鈥Jan 7, 2022
It was good at the beggning, but the final task was really dissapointing. It was just following steps on how to use a web service. It didn't help to learn how to build a model from scratch or it's basis.
By Michael F
鈥Jan 27, 2025
While the course in general gives a very good overview of AI, it is at times quite repetitive. The correct multiple choice options in the quizzes are at times contradicting with the taught content.
By Tushar B
鈥Apr 18, 2020
A very basic course just explaining what AI is and what it can do. The course gives the most basic of basics and necessary I feel for the intermediate topics. The readings have to be made better
By Jan L
鈥Mar 31, 2022
The general theory about AI is good, but I found the course from Andrew Ng better. This course could be shortened and a little more general and less IBM centric. However it is a recommendation
By David B
鈥Aug 6, 2024
A bit of a sloppily prepared set of lessons and slides and a bit all over the place. Some assignments had broken web links. Not the strongest effort was made in the creation of this course.
By Ellen H
鈥Sep 15, 2023
It was interesting and I learned a lot about the potential for AI applications. Most of the labs and honors assignment links were broken which brought down my overall opinion of the course.
By Pia D
鈥Aug 7, 2023
It was informative, and covered many different aspects of AI. However, some areas (ethics and how can I get a job in AI) were a little lengthy. Not exactly sure what I would change.
By Dror Y
鈥Jul 23, 2020
The first week gives you important terms from the AI world, and explains it beautifully.
The rest of the course may be interesting, but has nothing to do with actual learning.
By Xinyu Z
鈥Aug 19, 2024
It would be better if there are more female engineers, managers or CEOs in the interview, but no. It looks like IBM doesn't use a very diverse team on the technology side.
By Andrew H
鈥Jun 11, 2023
It explained some useful things such as supervised, unsupervised and reinforcement learning as well as job advice but other than that it was mostly a waste of time.
By Soumabha B
鈥Sep 21, 2020
Very nice course. It gives the basic idea of AI. But something missing in this course. The course not gives that detailing that I expected. Overall a good course.
By Luke G
鈥Aug 4, 2023
Quite boring and acts as a plug for IBM over much educational value. Lots of broken links for resources and actions. Disappointed. Can definitely be skipped.
By Stan S
鈥Mar 30, 2022
The course is very theoretical with very little hands-on experience of AI. Feels a bit like marketing play for IBM and a chance to show off their system
By Julian D
鈥May 17, 2023
AI moves so fast, a class that is a few years old is already lagging behind the state of the current technology. Still interesting and a good intro.
By Ruaridh T
鈥Mar 1, 2022
Having to wait to review a peer's work makes it difficult to complete the course. You have to wait until someone else posts before you can finish.
By Doug S
鈥Jan 28, 2025
The videos in people in them were generally excellent. The computerized-sounding voice in the other presentations wasn't very engaging.