Learner Reviews & Feedback for Structuring Machine Learning Projects by DeepLearning.AI
About the Course
Top reviews
MG
Mar 31, 2020
It is very nice to have a very experienced deep learning practitioner showing you the "magic" of making DNN works. That is usually passed from Professor to graduate student, but is available here now.
YP
Jul 26, 2018
Very important and valuable intuitions about DNN training/optimization. It's full of really practical information while implementing my own models.DNN鞚 鞁れ牅 鞝侅毄頃犽晫 氚橂摐鞁 鞚错暣頃橁碃 鞝侅毄頃挫暭 頃 鞁れ鞝 雮挫毄霌る 甑劚霅 氅嬱 旖旍姢 鞛呺媹雼!
5501 - 5525 of 5,745 Reviews for Structuring Machine Learning Projects
By Farid A
鈥Jul 19, 2022
- could have been better with more hands-on excerices or assignments.
- the assignments were quite hard compared to the lectures
By Jean-Michel P
鈥Jun 29, 2021
I feel like this course should be broken down and included in the other courses to get better context within these other courses.
By Raghu t D
鈥Aug 6, 2018
this session was good it would be more better if they provided the code of them..so that we could be abke to learn more from them
By Denys G
鈥Nov 24, 2017
Felt a bit rushed, each video was full of good tips but personally I think each video should have been a jupyternotebook instead.
By Massimo A
鈥Nov 18, 2017
More theoretical than the other courses in the specialisation but still very high quality.
Short but with a lot of information.
By David P
鈥Oct 17, 2017
Not nearly as good as the first two courses. These two weeks should probably be added into the second course at some point...
By Oliver O
鈥Oct 16, 2017
Would like more applied discussion and for it to be Longer. In particular I would like to see a discussion on class imbalance.
By Shuai W
鈥Sep 19, 2017
The content of this course is a bit too little for me.
However, it provides useful guidance for my projects. Much appreciated!
By Gary S
鈥Sep 16, 2017
Not nearly as valuable as the first Deep Learning course. And the questions posed in the quizzes seemed far more subjective.
By Pejman M
鈥Oct 22, 2017
Programming practices with TensorFlow should have continued in this course. Unfortunately, these two weeks were all talking.
By Nithin V
鈥Jan 3, 2021
Need more quizzes, assignments to deepen the understanding, But otherwise thank you Andrew Ng for presenting this material
By Panos K
鈥Apr 18, 2021
The pace of the first part of the course was too slow. The second part (from Transfer learning onwards) was much better.
By Mustafa H
鈥Jul 17, 2018
This course does discuss interesting and important subjects but I feel it can be combined with course 2 of this series
By ahmed a
鈥Jul 11, 2018
course is very good have a lot of important theory, it will be amazing if become 3 weeks with programming assignments.
By Kevin Q
鈥Mar 19, 2018
lot of issues with assignments and ambiguous quiz questions this time around, not as polished as other Andrew courses
By Arghya R
鈥Sep 19, 2017
Could have more case studies and above all. Also programing assignments on self driving car could have been better
By Okhtay A
鈥Apr 6, 2020
A bit too free form compared to the other courses in deep learning specialization, but maybe that was the goal.
By Masih B
鈥Jul 18, 2020
This course could be way more better, if it also focused on codeing with tensorflow (like the previous course)
By Janet C
鈥Jun 30, 2019
Overview of the machine learning process. No projects or sample code to actually organize the ideas into code.
By Aniruddh B
鈥Apr 16, 2020
Very nice, but I don't believe the content merits a full course. It could be integrated with courses 1 and 2.
By Vitaliy
鈥Feb 28, 2018
To much talk but understandable. Need something like programming examples with different data distributions.
By Rob W
鈥May 12, 2018
Seemed to be information that could have been included in another course rather than its own 2 week course.
By Idan P
鈥May 28, 2018
Lectures can be summed up by: "use common sense".
Quiz can be summed up by "to pass, use OUR common sense".
By Abd-Elrahman B
鈥Dec 21, 2017
The quiz questions are quite confusing and some of them are not consistent with the content of the videos.
By Rishabh B
鈥Jan 3, 2020
Slightly repetitive from previous courses. Could have been integrated with the future or previous course.