Learner Reviews & Feedback for Mastering Digital Twins by EIT Digital
About the Course
Top reviews
II
Dec 29, 2020
Interesting course on Digital Twins from a cross-sector perspective such as Utilities, Energy Manufacturing etc, and not just the Construction sector (which is where I've heard of Digital Twins).
VJ
Jan 27, 2024
This Course could have gone a little deeper into digital twins and how they are used. But Overall the course is very good.
76 - 100 of 117 Reviews for Mastering Digital Twins
By Michaela S
鈥Sep 20, 2021
This is a good start to the basics of Digital Twins. The content could have been better structured to improve understanding, and more examples throughout would have been helpful. It's still not clear to me how customer interactions can work within a Digital Twin. The quiz was a bit confusing - many of the questions require multiple answers and that was not clear in the quiz.
By Alan D P
鈥Jul 3, 2020
Short but interesting. Very light overview but opens the door to Digital Twin.
Bit of a marketing tool for their online course offerings.
Still, doesn't take long. Worth doing if you have a mild interest.
By Nandeesh G
鈥Jun 30, 2019
Very concise and to point. It was able to generate my interest in the Topic and I am now looking forward to take the Master course. Thanks!
By Jay S
鈥Nov 29, 2021
Good brief for giving an overall idea about the concept of Digital Twins. Looking forward for more domain focused online courses from EIT.
By Lalit P
鈥Apr 19, 2020
The covers good fundamentals nicely. The course should provide some real-time example how Digital Twin helps.
By Nushin S
鈥Apr 2, 2020
as an introduction as well prepared. I think more examples can make it much easier to understand.
thanks :)
By Sherin A K
鈥Jun 27, 2021
the cource provides a good overview, however more details on implmentation shall be good
By Ramakrishnan G
鈥Aug 17, 2020
Nice introduction about the idea of implementing the digital twins in the industry.
By Alexander S
鈥Oct 9, 2022
Helpful if you are new to digital twin, all the basics termnology covered.
By 袩械褌褉芯胁 袨 袦
鈥Mar 1, 2021
Nice, but very short. It does not give knowledge how to develop DT's.
By Hakan G
鈥Mar 16, 2022
This course should be more comprehensive but it was very good.
By Rodrigo V G
鈥Apr 4, 2020
Very easy to understand and gives an overview of the topic
By Manoj G
鈥Sep 19, 2022
This course gives insight on Digital Twins Concept
By Ram W
鈥May 18, 2021
It was a good introductory course on Digital Twins.
By Amal A ( R - H A
鈥Jul 14, 2022
Great course for begginers in Digital twin topic
By Ravindra P
鈥May 9, 2019
Expected more details. This was too brief.
By Manal C
鈥Jul 25, 2024
it was really short but a nice micromooc
By chibuzor s
鈥Jan 26, 2022
it was a great and interactive course.
By Giuseppe S
鈥Feb 15, 2025
Molto interessante e stimolante
By Utkarsh A
鈥Jun 25, 2019
Very Good Explanation.
By Wael Y
鈥May 20, 2019
It is an overview only
By Hassan G
鈥May 4, 2022
it is too short
By BADGUJAR B A
鈥Oct 23, 2019
Best course....
By Vivek K S
鈥Apr 21, 2020
a
By Fahad G
鈥Nov 5, 2020
Overall the course was interesting. However, there were some important points that I wanted to raise.
There is no mention of the fact that there is no agreed upon definition of digital twins. A paper from Fraunhofer itself discussed it in details, "The digital twin theory".The development process presented in the video is quite waterfall-like. Gone are the days for such software development. If not agile, people use iterative processes as minimum. I do not understand why digital twin development process should be different from other software & systems development approaches.The last video refers to Gartners Hype cycle for Emerging Technologies 2018. What about the 2019 version where the mention of digital twins is lost. And when it comes to 2020 version, it only talks about "ditial twin of the person". Is is because it was really a hype?The course talks about digital master, digital shadow and digital twin without giving reference to the appropriate research articles that suggest this terminology. There is no mention of digital twin type and digital twin instances.