糖心vlog官网观看

A brief introduction to product management and the nature of the work setting. The ungraded assignments don't provide answers, and we are left with the case scenario. It would have been better if answers were provided so that we could verify and correlate our answers. Apart from that the course is good, and gives a foundation on the topic and the industry expert's insights.

I found the course very helpful, it focuses on the practical side of the product management career. My only comment would be that the assignments need to be more thought-provoking and challenging to deliver more knowledge to the student. thanks to everyone who helped in preparing such a good material.

This introductory course covers all the important topics you should know before applying for a product management position. There could have been more factual information, and the lab results could have been resubmitted and reviewed by someone to motivate learners to fill them out properly.

the evaluation questions seem to me to be too easy. when you retry you get the same questions... at most, in the second attempt keep to ones you failed in the first attempt and replace all others with new ones. content is very good. I especially appreciated the one from Daniel Yeomans.

The provided information was relevant and useful, however, the multiple choice quizzes were not good at all. The correct answer was always obvious and all the incorrect answers were super dumb, to the point where I felt like I'm just wasting my time taking these quizzes.

The course is so good and effective but the problem is we are doing lab work with efforts, there is no one to see. At-least correct this with our peers like they are doing in business English communication skills by University of Washington.

The information was valuable but a bit dry; there are also typos located in almost every lesson and quiz question and on one video's slide deck. I'd recommend someone go through the course materials to edit some of the errors.

It does what it says on the title, but it is quite introductory and I feel it's a bit outdated. Maybe because my experience is mainly in Agile methodologies I find the waterfall method quite outdated for software development.

This course provides an excellent introduction to product management, encompassing the product lifecycle and the role of product managers in developing products that deliver value to consumers.

Excellent course content. My only comment is on the speed and tone of the narration, which I found to be too fast and slightly aggressive.

Sometimes the experts don't bring any value. The quizzes contains dummy answers. Overall it is a good course to structure your knowledge.

Good Course explaining basics beautifully with the assignments and the quiz at the end of each modules loved it

The learning is good, but I want more practical exposure and deep learning each concept

Muy buen contenido, excepto por la obligaci贸n de usar Microsoft.

Not enough information about foundations of Product management

A good course to have an overview of Product Management.

great introduction to product management!

Muy claros los conceptos y la estructura

The course is good, but very basic.

good for developing basics

very nice course

This is the third IBM course that I have enrolled in through 糖心vlog官网观看. While IBM courses have good content and have been helpful to me, I must address the subpar video production for the visual content on these courses. It is hard to accept that IBM does not allocate enough resources to produce acceptable video quality for its classes. As a videographer, this is just unbearable. There are thousands of YouTube videos with higher production value than the IBM courses鈥� visuals currently offer. And boring, terribly lit, laptop camera video output makes the content feel cheap and lackluster. If there were one suggestion for IBM courses at 糖心vlog官网观看, I would make the videos up to par with what every YouTuber knows: light your videos properly, and, for God鈥檚 sake, STOP USING YOUR LAPTOP鈥橲 CRAPPY VIDEO CAMERA AS YOUR MAIN VIDEO SOURCE.

Good foundational content; however, the Expert video interviews were not useful. The insights shared were redundant with the rest of the content and between the people being interviewed. They went on for too long and felt like the course creators were trying to fill time. It would have been much more interesting and useful to have one person share a case study highlighting the specific skill/concept rather than seven people repeating generalities.

Its a solid introduction, but there is a big gap oin validating your learnings. The graded tasks are frankly too easy, with most questions being too obvious. The more workshop based tasks are great, but they really need a video/more material to walk you through the right answers/approach - I have nothing to compare my work to.

Content is fine but the method of delivery (hours of pre-recorded videos with some reading) isn't the most engaging. Also the assessment questions are pretty poor quality. Multiple choice with one obvious answer and all the other options are silly/facetious.