糖心vlog官网观看

Deber铆a ser en espa帽ol

Excelente curso

It is very informative. However, it is quite dry and monotonous, unengaging and repetitive. it is essentially one long power point broken down into shorter videos presentations with intermittent video recording of professionals talking about their experience. The latter being fairly useful. The voice behind the power-point-like videos sounds so consistently monotonous that it is likely AI generated. Another issue I have with this course is the inconsistency of the example materials used in the teaching videos. For instance, instead of walking you through the phases of a particular project in order to demonstrate how the various pieces of documentation are developed throughout the planning phase, they use a different project to illustrate each type of document. Then you get to the final project where you have to generate a RBS and the template provided is not even the same as the one used in the teaching video. Overall, it's not terrible but it's far from great, and there's certainly room for improvement.

The course content was okay, although not as engaging or thorough as some other courses I have taken. I was really not impressed with the peer-grading for the assignment, though. There is no guarantee that a peer reviewer will have the expertise or will put in the effort to properly grade the assignment. I submitted an assignment (which had content for all sections) and received a grade of 50% because that reviewer said I hadn't submitted content for two sections. I then submitted the exact same assignment, absolutely no changes, and received a grade of 100%. So the assignment grades are meaningless. I much prefer the automated grading for the course I did through DeepLearning.AI.

Some materials are buggy but over all good.

The Videos were very boring.

There is jab, hook and uppercut in boxing. OK, enough talking. Rocky, now you have to figure out how to win World title. That's how this course felt. Typos, long, empty videos. Rushed on important parts, lengthened on unimportant part. Something is mentioned, in the test you have to be able to use it. Most of the course I had to study outside the 糖心vlog官网观看 - Youtube, google. If this course was meant as a index for things you should learn, then just provide list and I can find it myself. Final task was weird. You are given project that can be interpreted as you wish and then other people who are just as stupid as you are grading it not even diving in the numbers and other stuff. If the document has version number and project title - you are ok. Passed. :D

-a lot of the videos are read by some AI robot, it just sounds weird and it's kinda hard to follow

-mistakes and inconsistencies in the material make it hard to learn new information

-some of the audio recordings of presented videos are very poor in quality

peer editing is so annoying. don't make my completion dependant on that..

The material isn't presented efficiently. Topics are dispersed throughout the course, making it hard to follow; For example, most sections included questions in the quizes that required knowledge not covered in the material for that section. Also, there are numerous grammatical mistakes throughout the course material, which is extremely disappointing for a professional certification. What was most frustrating is that the assignments included poor cases, lacking vital information to solve the assignment properly; ie. ROI can't be calculated without defining the expected return on the project.

喙�喔涏箛喔權竸喔�喔�喔椸傅喙堗箓喔勦福喔曕箒喔⑧箞! 喙�喔�喔掂涪喙�喔о弗喔� 喔曕箟喔�喔囙福喔�喔溹弗喙傕斧喔о笗喔栢付喔囙笀喔班箘喔涏笗喙堗腑喙�喔權阜喙夃腑喔�喔侧腑喔粪箞喔權箘喔斷箟 喔夃副喔權箑喔�喔掂涪喙�喔о弗喔侧箘喔� 2 喔о副喔� 喙�喔炧阜喙堗腑喔｀腑喔溹弗喙傕斧喔о笗喔堗覆喔佮竸喔�喔�喔佮福喔班笀喔�喔佮笝喔掂箟 喔勦抚喔�!

mid