糖心vlog官网观看

非常喜欢

严谨！

欧老师

太好了

超棒

很好

讚

讚

讚

感谢欧教授以抽丝剥茧的方式，澄清一般人对部分唐诗的误解。欧教授认為:

我們不當以 兩性平權的價值觀去苛責杜甫在望月等詩中的妻子是 無聲及被擬視的被動客體。那麼,

我們似乎也不該用 不慕名利 的道德標準來苛責白居易。或許白居易和琵琶女都 俗。但以他們所處的環境，那就是他們的價值啊！白居易無法去欣賞接受偏鄉文化，試問我們這個所謂文明世界何時才懂得謙虛，去學習與欣賞原住民或少數民族的文化呢！

本课程旁徵博引，分析扎实，让我对中国古典文学有更广阔的认知。惟论及琵琶行一讲，显失公允，对此我留言在第六周讨论区，若老师有看到的话希望能进行相关讨论。

老师总结了前人的观点并进行了评点，并指出了一些普通人会犯的谬误，有些观点很值得深思，有些观点值得讨论。

喜欢这几周的课程内容，不同於以往课本教的含意，尤其特别喜欢王维那章授课内容!

让我从不同的角度唐诗，重新认识国文并学习生命态度

别开生面新思路，春风化雨欧老师！

Many concepts discussed in this course are done in such arbitrarity. The script of the class could really use some editing as well, to be honest. I have to speed up the video manually because many sentences repeat themselves just in a different shell.

Be more critical when speaking of concepts practiced in western academia in the late 80s to early 2000 (or at least, use some of those edited-out space to give it a mention), coz you know times a changin? If you must refer to concept popularized in western academia, please keep up with how they progressed throughout the years, the academia's attitude regarding several topics has changed since. And maybe don't use English if it's unnecessary? It's not like the pronunciations are terribly good.

课程很多内容有点牵强附会，穿凿附会，咬文嚼字之感。