糖心vlog官网观看

Basic instructions and exercises in module 2 were good. Good start to learning six sigma, but has some minor flaws in study materials. Big problem is that there is a book requirement in this one which you cannot get through the course, and some of the test quiz are based on that book, and video materials don't really tell the answers. You can keep guessing the answers unlimited times, but that defeats the point of a test in my opinion. Also some of the videos have some low volume problems.

There are some videos with very low voice, so I can't hear clearly. Unfortunately, some of the low-voice videos don't have the subtitle/transcript.

Not as in depth as I hoped it would be.

Hello, I鈥檇 like to report an issue with one of the slides in the Six Sigma Foundations and Principles course by Kennesaw State University. The slide discussing the roles of the Black Belt and Master Black Belt contains several errors not limited to but, including: 鈥渟te ground鈥� instead of 鈥渟et ground鈥� 鈥淏let鈥� instead of 鈥淏elt鈥� (appears twice) Multiple fragmented or incomplete sentences Since this course focuses on quality and process improvement, the presence of such errors in instructional material is especially concerning. I鈥檓 sharing this feedback in the spirit of continuous improvement and to support future learners. Thank you for reviewing this issue. Best regards, Kelly Boyer

Content sometimes is incomplete. Many videos lacks of transcript and audio is very low

I withdrew from this course because it was so poorly constructed. It looks like the videos may have been edited down from longer lectures by an AI editor using an outline, so the videos are brief, choppy, and disjointed. Quizzes include questions that are not covered in either the videos or in the reference text. Some questions appear to be AI-generated nonsense with no correct answer. When you get an answer wrong on a quiz, there is no explanation to help you improve your understanding, and the 糖心vlog官网观看 AI assistant is not always able to explain either. (Some answers provided by the AI assistant also failed on the quiz.) Your exercise work is evaluated only by other learners, who are also unable (or unwilling to take the time) to explain what you might have gotten wrong. And then the course wastes your time by asking you to grade work by other learners. So: for exercises it's the blind leading the blind; for videos and quizzes the blind are being led by literalist robots who occasionally hallucinate. This course is not worth your time.

very poor content; the PowerPoint content do not match with the explanation

Awful. The videos don't help to answer the quizzes at all.