糖心vlog官网观看

Chevron Left
Back to Introduction to HTML5

Learner Reviews & Feedback for Introduction to HTML5 by University of Michigan

4.7
stars
27,704 ratings

About the Course

Thanks to a growing number of software programs, it seems as if anyone can make a webpage. But what if you actually want to understand how the page was created? There are great textbooks and online resources for learning web design, but most of those resources require some background knowledge. This course is designed to help the novice who wants to gain confidence and knowledge. We will explore the theory (what actually happens when you click on a link on a webpage?), the practical (what do I need to know to make my own page?), and the overlooked (I have the code, but how do I put it on the web to share with others?). Throughout the course there will be a strong emphasis on adhering to syntactic standards for validation and semantic standards to promote wide accessibility for users with disabilities. This course will appeal to a wide variety of people, but specifically those who would like a step-by-step description of the basics. There are no prerequisites for this course and it is assumed that students have no prior programming skills or IT experience. The course will culminate in a small final project that will require the completion of a very simple page with links and images. The focus of this course is on the basics, not appearance. You can see a sample final HTML page at https://example-site-1--wd4ehtml.repl.co/ . This is the first course in the Web Design For Everybody specialization. Subsequent courses focus on the marketable skills of styling the page with CSS3, adding interactivity with JavaScript and enhancing the styling with responsive design....

Top reviews

CR

Jan 31, 2016

Exceptional course, taught by a friendly, talented teacher. Perfect introduction to HTML. While the course seems to be still under development (there is the odd typo or the like) it's a great start.

PC

Sep 26, 2020

good session, the tutor has a good dynamic of speech, clear and easy to understand without falling asleep during my course, and appropriate knowledge of HTML, step to apply to the useful tools. thanks

Filter by:

7176 - 7200 of 7,264 Reviews for Introduction to HTML5

By VijayaKumar V

鈥�

Nov 27, 2020

Overall nice

By Lewis H

鈥�

May 3, 2016

Very basic

By Rupali s D

鈥�

May 23, 2020

very good

By Ramzi O

鈥�

Oct 7, 2020

generic

By Phan T 膼 L

鈥�

Jan 27, 2020

good <3

By Deleted A

鈥�

Sep 4, 2017

Not bad

By ROHITH K B

鈥�

Jul 2, 2020

superb

By Weerachai Y

鈥�

Jun 27, 2020

thanks

By Kevin B J

鈥�

Jun 11, 2021

good

By Deleted A

鈥�

Jul 2, 2020

great

By Albin F

鈥�

May 20, 2020

great

By Kapil R

鈥�

Sep 10, 2017

GOOD.

By Vishal T

鈥�

Sep 3, 2020

good

By K M M H R

鈥�

Jul 23, 2020

Good

By THIPPAVARAM A

鈥�

Jul 15, 2020

Good

By Harshad S

鈥�

Jun 14, 2020

nice

By PAVITHRA H

鈥�

Jun 7, 2020

good

By KOMPELLA S R H

鈥�

May 8, 2020

nice

By ANIKET P

鈥�

Jun 18, 2020

ok

By Raghad M M A

鈥�

Oct 2, 2023

.

By Hardik C

鈥�

Mar 5, 2022

t

By Deleted A

鈥�

Sep 22, 2021

By Lezlie B

鈥�

Feb 8, 2016

F

By Martina W

鈥�

Feb 8, 2016

If there had been a working autograder for the last final project this course would have been worth it somehow.

What does that mean?

- The lectures provided valuable information.

- The quizzes generally made sense (in relation to the lectures).

- Learning how to code wasn't really possible.

Why is that?

- There is only one programming assignment.

- The autograder doesn't give any feedback at all why resp. where things go wrong. That's everything but good style (for software as well as for learning).

- Code snippets can't be tested individually. That's very bad behavior in programming.

- At the end working code that meets the teached rules is marked as wrong. You are lost without any clue.

So probably you can learn something. Unfortunately you can't possibly finish the course with a feeling of success.

By Rae A M G

鈥�

Jun 26, 2024

It needs updated and more structured lessons. The teaching is too all over the place, links broken, outdated sites and modules need to be taught on a better timeline that corresponds to lessons better in a corresponding way, i.e., learning the meaning, explanation, and lists of things before the coding and labwork, tests not after the lesson is finished. When the instructor said she was not a good teacher, she really was correct.