糖心vlog官网观看

Good intro - I'm learning a lot. But in the end I feel that this specialization is not focused enough on developing portfolio pieces. One portfolio piece at the end of an 8-month course does not seem adequate to me. So I wish we focused more on developing high fidelity work - in addition to the need-finding, user research, sketches, short weekly assignments. This high fidelity, digital work could even be optional, but I need some guidance on what work to develop and how the overall process should look.

Or even being allowed to enroll in the capstone before completing the first 7 sections would be helpful.

It a refresher course for me. But materials need to be updated since the course was developed in 2015, there are so many softwares already that are inexpensive that allows you to do your prototypes. Likewise i am not a fan of peer grading as most of those i encountered are really taking this course seriously. Quizzes should also be improved as it leads to a lot of guess work when you do select all that applies . Anyway the basics are there . Videos are correctly phased as it is not too long to bore you out.

The course is a good overall approach to Human-Computer Interaction. It teaches how to do participan observation, interviewing, storyboarding and heuristic evaluation.

However, I would say that some of the assignments were too simple in terms of complexity and there was few opportunities to apply the theory in the assignments.

In general I found the course useful for people who want to learn more about how understand better customer necessities, for design in general.

Good introduction to HCD, steady paced. My two frustrations were with how some of the questions and answers are written. Please review these and improve the writing. Sometimes I would be thinking to myself "Wait, what?..." or I was unaware that multiple answers should be selected. The tool tip text under incorrect answers is still confusing to me, maybe this is a 糖心vlog官网观看 issue?

The content of the course was great. I believe it would be a good idea to have a data base or links for definitions of the main concepts used in the course. Also, it would be great if the instructor or someone with experience in the field reviews the assignments and participate more on the forums.

I believe there is important to have access to the comments of our peers, I've receive some bad grades and I don't know why. And I think part of the learning process is get to know here I'm falling.

El curso es bueno, pero podr铆a tener temas m谩s actualizados seg煤n el mercado. Manejo de herramientas, tareas un poco mas complejas y una duraci贸n m谩s extensa. Buen curso!

It is a great course and I learn a lot but it is sometimes difficult to pay attention because the videos aren't very entertaining

could be restructured, more headers during the video, otherwise its easier to just read the text (as non native speaker)

The content of this course is good but the production quality of the videos are not vary high.

The assignments are confusing and hard to understand. I'd love it if they were more clear.

It's a great introductory class, but would like more personal feedback from professionals.

Subt铆tulos en tiempos distintos a la voz del facilitador, se hace sumamente inc贸modo

Good concepts, but no practical hands on experience

Prefer more references/examples shown in lectures.

excellent course but should be more in depth

Too hard to accomplish

Achei fraco. Os v铆deos s茫o claramente desatualizados e o professor 茅 meio perdido. Os conte煤dos precisam urgentemente serem atualizados assim como as v铆deos aulas. Pelo valor pago, achei ultrapassado!

A bit difficult to understand the language for non native speaker. Nearly impossible to complete works.

Buenos contenidos. Un tanto lento y costoso de seguir.

袟邪褔械屑 锌懈褋邪褌褜 锌褉芯 褉褍褋褋泻芯褟蟹褘褔薪褍褞 胁械褉褋懈褞, 械褋谢懈 写谢褟 褉褍褋褋泻芯褟蟹褘褔薪芯谐芯 锌芯谢褜蟹芯胁邪褌械谢褟 薪械 褋写械谢邪薪 写邪卸械 薪械芯斜褏芯写懈屑褘泄 写谢褟 芯斜褍褔械薪懈褟 屑懈薪懈屑褍屑? 袪褍褋褋泻懈械 褋褍斜褌懈褌褉褘 薪械 褋芯芯褌胁械褌褋褌胁褍褞褌 邪薪谐谢芯褟蟹褘褔薪芯屑褍 褌械泻褋褌褍: 锌械褉械胁芯写 薪械褌芯褔薪褘泄; 褋褍斜褌懈褌褉褘 褉邪褋褋懈薪褏褉芯薪懈蟹懈褉芯胁邪薪褘 褋芯 蟹胁褍泻芯屑 懈 写械泄褋褌胁懈械屑 薪邪 褝泻褉邪薪械; 屑邪褌械褉懈邪谢 芯斜褉械蟹邪薪 锌褉懈屑械褉薪芯 薪邪 30% (锌械褉械胁芯写 锌芯写 胁懈写械芯 锌芯谢薪褘泄; 胁 褋褍斜褌懈褌褉邪褏 锌芯 泻邪泻芯泄-褌芯 锌褉懈褔懈薪械 鈥� 薪械褌).

袙褋械 褍锌褉邪卸薪械薪懈褟 鈥� 薪邪 褟蟹褘泻械 芯褉懈谐懈薪邪谢邪. 袣邪泻 懈褏 胁褘锌芯谢薪褟褌褜 鈥� 薪械锌芯薪褟褌薪芯.

小褌褘写薪芯 斜褉邪褌褜 写械薪褜谐懈 蟹邪 褌邪泻芯械!

Well I should be expecting an online course about designing would suck. You can't do this online and you can't do this without a real project

Very basic. Everything in here can be found online on a blog, youtube video or a book. dont waste your money.

Sorry, but this course is extremely lack of architecture, making it hard to keep up with the teacher.

This course doesn't worth the price. It just split a semester long course into eight chapters.