糖心vlog官网观看

Great Course!! I learned alot!!

Great course. Well-designed.

well structured. thank you.

A very informative course.

Excited about this class!

枚臒retici ve faydal谋yd谋.

Very well done modules.

This is very helpful.

Excellent course!

intersting course

I learned a lot!

good for new ID

It was a good

Very helpful

Very helpful!

Great course

great course

Great...!!!

Great!

Good

While I have learned from this course, I'm afraid that I have to agree with some of the reviews: its design could stand to be further enhanced鈥攕omething of an irony, given that it deals with instructional design.

The videos are far too long and too unvaried to be engaging or memorable. The "talking head" format of the videos adds little value; I suspect that providing the lessons in the form of slide presentations that students could work through on their own would have been just as, if not more, effective. Creating smaller chunks of content would also make everything more manageable.

With regard to the assessments, I wish that I could have gotten feedback from the instructors on the assignments. While I understand the place of peer feedback in all kinds of learning, the fact of the matter is that neither my peers nor I are the subject-matter experts. Moreover, I found the quizzes a bit frustrating, because they contemplate only very thin slices of the substantial content that students are expected to have thoroughly digested beforehand.

Finally, the videos make reference to a Master Track Certificate, which I understand can no longer be earned by taking this particular course. In that sense, the videos are outdated.

I really appreciated the course. It was well organized, with solid information. However, leaving one of the essay assignments to be graded by one person, rather than multiple people to find an average score, might need to be fixed - as that one person might have mis-read or mis-understood the essay. I have taken several other 糖心vlog官网观看 courses, and this is the first course where one other student can determine 20% of the grade, rather than having multiple peer graders and finding an average.

Also, some of the quiz questions are vaguely worded. Some quiz questions are unnecessarily complex and unevenly loaded (e.g. loading a question with five or nine different choices and asking "select all that apply" so that even if four or eight correct responses are chosen, the entire question is marked incorrect because of one out of nine choices) versus questions that have the simple choice of false or true.

Overall, the course helped me feel more confident in my knowledge of and abilities as I am beginning to enter this field of work.

My only two complaints are about some of the quiz questions and about the time frame corresponding to the readings. For the quiz questions, there was one in week 4 that wasn't even a question (the one about matching learning goal statements to domains of learning), so it wasn't exactly clear what I was supposed to do. One the whole, I got more out of the writing exercises than the quiz questions, and I think these should be used more. For the reading time frames, it always took me much more than 10 minutes to do these.