糖心vlog官网观看

Nice for HTML, nice and the lessons for css but you can not learn javascript in just one unit.I would prefer more lessons about javascript and also more readable units because cover everything very fast so you have no time to exercise.Also the lab was broken every time.

when i enrolled the course it was shown enroll for free but now it was showing upgrade or subscription is required.

The content is excellent, but the final project (Module 4) shouldn't be a third-party person qualifiable.

Deber铆a ser m谩s pr谩ctico y no tan teorico hay muchas partes dif铆ciles de entender solo te贸ricamente.

鬲賲 丕禺鬲氐丕乇 丕賱賰孬賷乇 賲賳 丕賱賲毓賱賵賲丕鬲 賵丕賱丿乇賵爻, 賷噩亘 丿丕卅賲丕 賲鬲丕亘毓丞 賲氐丿乇 禺丕乇噩賷 賱賮賴賲 賰賱 卮賷卅,

The practice is pretty hard to understand but the courses are well detail.

It's basic and miss hands-on and that more important than anything else.

me ha gustado el curso, aun que es un poco simple

A Very Satisfying Experience

Good

ok

Positives 1. This course contained short but informative videos. 2. Overall, the course was helpful in progressing my front-end development knowledge. Negatives A. Quizzes 1. Poor scrolling experience on quiz pages may cause users to unintentionally select a different answer. 2. Quiz submission confirmation dialog boxes seem to be unnecessary. 3. The 糖心vlog官网观看 Honors Code should only be mentioned for graded quizzes. 4. Some of the questions and answers in multiple quizzes came off as confusing and inaccurate, so they have to be reviewed. B. Labs 1. At least a couple of programming examples from the labs contain code errors when run in a browser and don't look professional. 2. Lab completion time is underestimated due to the following: - Labs only functioned properly in the Firefox browser. - Edge's 'Read aloud' voice kept getting stuck due to poor text formatting. - Cloud IDE's slow & unstable connections caused some delay. C. Reading 1. The audio option didn't work in a few reading material sections, so this technical issue needs to be fixed. 2. This course is full of spelling errors, especially in the lab instructions. D. Design 1. This course should encourage students to design something on their own rather than follow lots of boring Copy & Paste steps. 2. The final project of this course contains duplicate lab instructions that need to be removed. 3. It's not students' job to review someone else's work, and my assignment was not graded correctly by someone.

weak in material, the labs are not really teaching you much and it goes over the content very superficially. Luckily i had prior experience with js, html and css.

Might be difficult for someone with no prior experience in JS. A lot of coding examples are missing in the lectures

i submitted my final project but it didn't credit for it i think there is a problem with it fix it.

This is not beginner friendly. not much explanation but more reading

Too much of this is taught by an AI; it's not very engaging.

Absolutely useless. Poorly taught, lessons out of order, spelling and grammar issues. Final Project has nothing to do with the 'taught skills'. Absolute waste of time. Cannot get a certificate until someone happens to grade your project. What a fucking frustrating experience.

No me permite avanzar a los siguientes cursos sin tener una calificaci贸n, esto implica demora en mi proceso

For the certificate I applied for, I abviously already know that. A total waste of time.

Error messages in final project. No support. What a massive waste of time.

all practical assessment are not working

No tareas por pares, no pantallazos.

Actually, one star is too many.

i hate the ai peer grading