糖心vlog官网观看

乇丕卅毓赖

Nice

噩賲賷賱

good

nice

like

good

G

HE TERMINADO ESTE Y LOS OTROS 4 CURSOS RELACIONADOS AL COACHING QUE RECOMIENDAN Y SON DE LA UNIVERSIDAD DE CALIFORNIA INCLUYENDO LA ESPECIALIZACI脫N Y LLEVO D脥AS DE LARGAS HORAS REALIZANDO TODO NUEVAMENTE PARA QUE ME COMPLETE LOS CURSOS BENDITOS ASI RECIBO MI CERTIFICACI脫N CORRESPONDIENTE QUE ME HE GANANDO Y MEREZCO POR MI ESFUERZO Y TIEMPO DISPUESTO PUES PARA ESO LOS HAGO. YA NO ES LA PRIMERA VEZ QUE A TRAV脡S DE COURSERA ME SUCEDE Y ES FRUSTRANTE PORQUE CON KELLER WILLIAMS ME SUCEDI脫 ALGO SIMILAR EN MESES PASADOS.

The course was overwrought in general - seemed like it could have been accomplished in four weeks instead of five. The instructor was clear most of the time, but there were places were the concepts were unclear, probably 80 percent was on target. This might explain the inconsistent grading of written assignments. Needs some fine tuning, but worth the time.

i supposed that may be i am not very clever so the content and the question after the class also make me confused. a little bit disapoint with this course. but i saw a lot people below think this a good course so may be i am wrong.

The concepts were interesting and helpful. It would be professional of the instructor to cite sources and employ classic principles of curriculum design. The construction of quiz items is a particular opportunity for improvement.

Good overall content - but absolutely no need for the extensive 4th module of a detailed peer-reviewed project - this type of thing undermines the overall value of taking the course..

Most of it was for beginners. Thought model is interesting, the rest was too high level, that should not be new to a manager.

Very good for those who start, inspirational for whoever. Thanks. Blaho

Very good but slightly basic. Great starting point.

Expected a more in depth knowledge on Coaching.

good

oke

This course feels quite weak, especially for the paid course, for these reasons:

Models (Leader as Mentor, Coach, etc..., CTFAR model), which are given in this course, are given as is, with no references on how they were developed, authorship, and how good the results of application are.

Almost no (just one) external references for reading to better understanding course material.

The amount of material (about 3 hours of video, 4 quizzes, 2 discussions and 1 assignment) doesn't feel like it's a month's course, more like a one/one-and-a-half week.

No references on topics, described as "hard" during the course (for example, identifying your values), which would make this topics less "hard".

No instructor interaction on the course forum (I don't know if this should be like this or not, but it still feels bad).

However, the final assignment is good and practice oriented.

The first module has very few about coaching. There are some interesting topics for self-reflection around point of views, capability to distinguish between facts, thoughts, how approach to emotions, etc. But I found it overall very boring. I understand there are some basics to cover, but it could really be a 15 min video. The second module looks better so far.

Very easy, just a model: circumstance- thought-feeling-action-result; not challenging enough

its too hard to foloww and t\it has alot of information at the same time

no puedo realizarlo porque no hay traduccion al espa帽ol

Dice que esta en espa帽ol, pero no es verdad.