SB
Aug 14, 2023
Found the course has given me a greater insight into the world of LLM, how they think and the number of other LLM鈥檚 that sit behind ChatGPT. Enjoyed the 糖心vlog官网观看 platform as a positive learning tool.
MS
Feb 21, 2024
Prompt Engineering for ChatGPT has been a great introduction course. I look forward to diving into additional AI courses. I've even joined a Meetup group to continue learning outside of the classroom!
By Howard C F S
鈥Sep 18, 2023
Interesting course.
By Balaraju P
鈥Feb 1, 2024
great explanation
By 1017_Sourav N
鈥Sep 26, 2024
very good course
By Martin C
鈥Oct 14, 2023
Cours tr猫s riche
By JUAN E Z C
鈥Aug 27, 2024
muy interesante
By Oscar I C C
鈥Mar 12, 2025
muy extenso
By Khalil E K
鈥Sep 5, 2024
Thank you.
By Renato R G
鈥Mar 13, 2025
Very good
By 0025 p k
鈥Nov 11, 2024
to good
By Roshani D D
鈥Aug 4, 2023
Helpful
By tainp11
鈥Jun 4, 2023
so good
By Blessing M
鈥Oct 21, 2024
great
By Eshwar R
鈥Aug 22, 2024
good
By Shrikrushna S K
鈥Apr 10, 2024
Good
By Suraj M
鈥Oct 24, 2023
Good
By Kolli R
鈥Oct 13, 2023
Nice
By Kiriti S S
鈥Sep 10, 2023
nice
By Nuhed N
鈥Aug 26, 2023
w
By Omer G
鈥Jul 18, 2024
This course was something of a disappointment. The professor is a bit long-winded, and never did show how to ask a simple question, then a follow-up question, then a question after that, etc. to get the response you want and have a conversation go in a good direction. That's one of the most basic uses of ChatGPT. A lot of the "patterns" that he discusses seem more appropriate if you want to build your own chatbot, taking in lots of data from users or sifting through lots of internal data. I can see why his background is in computer science, because he seemed to focus more on the technical aspects of pattern after pattern rather than issues having to do with wording and critical thinking as you have conversations with ChatGPT.
By Lain E
鈥Oct 21, 2024
The instructor spends a lot of time on easy concepts and then lumps more complex concepts together in later lessons. It would be better to do the reverse. Also, not all prompts are included in the reading. A resource guide or some kind of handout with all the discussed prompts would greatly benefit the learner. Finally, it doesn't seem like anyone is answering questions in the discussion forums. Since this is a paid class, I expected a TA would periodically review the questions there to provide greater insight.
By Irina S
鈥Sep 3, 2024
Professor is engaging and provides clear explanations. The examples however are a bit limiting in their applicability to other areas (hard to see how to generalize them to other useful contexts). The examples were entertaining and interesting to follow, but perhaps that should not be the goal. Perhaps more information should have been offered on how to bring other tools into the chat to help solve problems. I guess it's ok overall given that the professor had to distill information in an emerging field.
By Karen J
鈥Nov 13, 2024
I really enjoyed many aspects of this course, but it assumed more knowledge about computer science than I possess. Maybe this was not the right course for this, but I was hoping for something very very basic. However, I did learn many interesting takeaways and being married to a developer for 30 years really helped my understanding. If I did not have that I would have been hopelessly lost at some points.
By M峄 L T
鈥Feb 18, 2025
Although most of the patterns are useful, the content is too long. The instructor may eliminate unrelated content during the lesson to make it more focused and concise. Showing the initial content while talking about something else at the same time really distracts me.
By Joanna C
鈥Nov 22, 2023
The content was interesting and the instructor was very knowledgeable but I found the content very repetitive, the videos were too long and I thought that a lot of the concepts could have been explained in shorter videos or in a shorter course overall.
By Andrew M
鈥Apr 7, 2025
Course was good, but the assessment was very basic, it was all just demonstrating prompts, and all worth 1 mark so no indication of if it was good or just barely triggered what the AI was looking for.